←back to thread

1041 points mpweiher | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
medlazik ◴[] No.45225462[source]
Uranium mining isn't clean at all. Between Greenpeace (full of business school hacks) and lobby pressured EU courts, there's a middle ground.
replies(3): >>45225584 #>>45225589 #>>45225770 #
acidburnNSA ◴[] No.45225589[source]
What do you mean? Modern in situ uranium mining is one of the lowest impact mining of resources we have. It's not perfectly clean, but it's pretty darn good.
replies(1): >>45225667 #
medlazik ◴[] No.45225667[source]
>What do you mean?

I mean it's not clean

>one of the lowest impact mining of resources we have

Not the point. It's not clean, it shouldn't be called clean end of the story.

replies(5): >>45225768 #>>45225796 #>>45225799 #>>45225919 #>>45226522 #
alexey-salmin ◴[] No.45225768[source]
Do you think rare earth minerals for batteries and photovoltaics grow on trees?
replies(2): >>45225805 #>>45227861 #
1. medlazik ◴[] No.45225805[source]
Who talked about those? Not the fucking point. Nuclear isn't clean.
replies(1): >>45225908 #
2. alexey-salmin ◴[] No.45225908[source]
What source of energy is clean then?
replies(1): >>45226431 #
3. KaseKun ◴[] No.45226431[source]
No point, old mate just can't deal with anything but perfection. No energy source is clean, so let's not bother.