←back to thread

1041 points mpweiher | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dmitrygr ◴[] No.45225428[source]
[flagged]
replies(4): >>45225555 #>>45225750 #>>45226305 #>>45228808 #
thw_9a83c ◴[] No.45225555[source]
I see your point but it's not really that simple in this particular case. Nuclear energy production is clean under assumption:

1. You can operate the facility with a zero critical accident over the whole lifespan of the power plant.

2. You know what to do with a nuclear waste (like keep it safely deeply buried for 10'000 years).

However, point 2) is almost irrelevant now because we already have enough depleted nuclear fuel to deal with it.

replies(2): >>45225597 #>>45225827 #
1. sealeck ◴[] No.45225597[source]
Both of these assumptions are true. Obviously these are not trivial problems, and take a lot of work, but they are extremely tractable.