←back to thread

277 points Gaishan | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.946s | source
1. dekhn ◴[] No.45201357[source]
This isn't really a "finding"- it's a theoretical prediction based on observed data, along with a proposed experimental apparatus to detect such items.

I don't really get excited for theoretical predictions like this - I want experimental observations!

replies(1): >>45202635 #
2. dekhn ◴[] No.45203053[source]
I have a clue, and my point is not pedantic, it's clarifying. If they found- using experimental apparatus- some physical evidence, it would be a 'finding'.
replies(1): >>45206654 #
3. plumb_bob_00 ◴[] No.45206654{3}[source]
GP was rude and out of line, but to be frank with you, it is pedantic to quibble about the definition of the word "finding", a word which doesn't even appear in the article (yes, I did see the title).

If the research doesn't interest or impress you, there's plenty of other articles.