←back to thread

292 points natalie3p | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
1. nextworddev ◴[] No.45200033[source]
At whose expense?
replies(2): >>45200073 #>>45200138 #
2. Funes- ◴[] No.45200073[source]
Everyone's.
3. Zak ◴[] No.45200138[source]
The article offers several options depending on the question's perspective. The commercial answer would be publishers of longer-form content, but the more sociologically important one would be that it is harming the ability of the average person to engage with long-form information, making the phenomenon costly to the whole world.
replies(1): >>45200955 #
4. tsunamifury ◴[] No.45200955[source]
The idea that long form = good is absurd and this type of thinking shows how over-confident this author is in their own intelligence.

Information compression and storage is the baseline of our species evolution.

replies(1): >>45201308 #
5. Zak ◴[] No.45201308{3}[source]
Ahh, it seems I made my comment too short.

I don't think that long-form content is always superior to short, but I do think overconsumption of short-form content reduces peoples' ability to handle irreducible complexity.

replies(1): >>45207805 #
6. tsunamifury ◴[] No.45207805{4}[source]
Agree the act of compression itself is likely a huge part of intelligence.

Also appreciate the joke.