←back to thread

277 points Gaishan | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
dash2 ◴[] No.45194159[source]
This feels very cynical, but what incentive does NASA have to do research showing alien life is not very likely in our solar system?
replies(3): >>45194306 #>>45194669 #>>45202418 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.45194306[source]
This is a point I keep making: every one of NASA’s Mars missions has very carefully excluded any scientific instrument that could conclusively eliminate the presence of life... and hence future missions to find life.

I.e.: they don’t carry high power microscopes because apparently there’s no room for one on a 900kg rover the size of a car.

replies(3): >>45194468 #>>45194494 #>>45194656 #
Scarblac ◴[] No.45194468[source]
What kind of instrument could conclusively eliminate presence of life?
replies(2): >>45194486 #>>45195017 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.45195017[source]
Anything that can return a sample. Notice that Curiosity collects samples, but omits the sample return rocket.

A good enough microscope can easily tell the difference between life and non-life, especially in the presence of water. If it moves on its own, it is almost certainly alive!

Certain kinds of chromatographs can conclusively determine that no complex chemicals are present, the kind essential to life. I.e.: if only simple metal oxides and the like are present, then you have only a rock.

replies(4): >>45195576 #>>45195706 #>>45199412 #>>45199956 #
1. alessandru ◴[] No.45199956[source]
this guy is just nasa conspiracy bs repeater

you should go work for spacex and show them how to do the sample return. they've thought about it for at least a decade now and haven't yet. so you can go there and show them how since it's so easy. you'll be millionaire real quick i promise.