←back to thread

Anthropic judge rejects $1.5B AI copyright settlement

(news.bloomberglaw.com)
290 points nobody9999 | 1 comments | 09 Sep 25 08:46 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jawns ◴[09 Sep 25 19:02 UTC] No.45187038[source]▶
I'm an author, and I've confirmed that 3 of my books are in the 500K dataset.

Thus, I stand to receive about $9,000 as a result of this settlement.

I think that's fair, considering that two of those books received advances under $20K and never earned out. Also, while I'm sure that Anthropic has benefited from training its models on this dataset, that doesn't necessarily mean that those models are a lasting asset.

replies(22): >>45187319 #>>45187366 #>>45187519 #>>45187839 #>>45188602 #>>45189683 #>>45189684 #>>45190184 #>>45190223 #>>45190237 #>>45190555 #>>45190731 #>>45191633 #>>45192016 #>>45192191 #>>45192348 #>>45192404 #>>45192630 #>>45193043 #>>45195516 #>>45201246 #>>45218895 #
shermozle ◴[09 Sep 25 22:25 UTC] No.45190184[source]▶
It's far from fair given that if _I_ breach copyright and get caught, I go to jail, not just pay a fine.
replies(9): >>45190238 #>>45190245 #>>45190340 #>>45190669 #>>45190911 #>>45191443 #>>45191539 #>>45192702 #>>45196939 #
1. YetAnotherNick ◴[10 Sep 25 03:05 UTC] No.45192702[source]▶
You wont be put to jail if you breach copyright in almost any country, at least not just for downloading content from libgen or torrent. If you are talking about Swartz, he was going to jail for wire fraud and hacking not breaching copyright.