←back to thread

Anthropic judge rejects $1.5B AI copyright settlement

(news.bloomberglaw.com)
290 points nobody9999 | 7 comments | 09 Sep 25 08:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.239s | source | bottom
1. jokoon ◴[09 Sep 25 21:55 UTC] No.45189813[source]▶
That tiles is weird, what is an "Anthropic judge"?
replies(4): >>45189839 #>>45190320 #>>45190355 #>>45191614 #
2. rideontime ◴[09 Sep 25 21:57 UTC] No.45189839[source]▶
The judge for the Anthropic lawsuit, obviously.
replies(1): >>45190491 #
3. phaedryx ◴[09 Sep 25 22:35 UTC] No.45190320[source]▶
It sounds like the judge works for Anthropic
4. giveita ◴[09 Sep 25 22:38 UTC] No.45190355[source]▶
A human judge. Make the most of it, times are changing.
replies(1): >>45207593 #
5. ◴[09 Sep 25 22:48 UTC] No.45190491[source]▶
6. alok-g ◴[10 Sep 25 00:40 UTC] No.45191614[source]▶
Indeed. While I could sense what was implied, I also thought of some newly-launched 'AI Judge' by Anthropic making the said claim. :-)
7. m463 ◴[11 Sep 25 03:50 UTC] No.45207593[source]▶
not to be confused with an anthropomorphic judge.