←back to thread

271 points pykello | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.601s | source
Show context
zokier ◴[] No.45172139[source]
I love OpenWrt.

But I wished there was something similar but for "big" (in a relative sense) devices. I feel lot of the constraints OpenWrt is based on are not really that applicable when you have hundreds of megabytes of flash and RAM, and that is starting to become a common thing for routers these days. Even their own OpenWrt One router has 256M flash and a full gigabyte of RAM. That is not all that resource constrained anymore. What I would love is to have something that would be closer to "normal" linux distro while getting the networking goodies and ease of configuration from OpenWrt.

replies(5): >>45172869 #>>45172929 #>>45174523 #>>45174683 #>>45190428 #
thisislife2 ◴[] No.45174523[source]
I have the opposite complaint. I wish OpenWRT ran on low-resource routers like those really cheap TP-link ones. DD-WRT does support a few of it, and my personal opinion is that it is better optimised than OpenWRT. By the way, you should explore OpenBSD ( https://openbsdrouterguide.net/ ).
replies(2): >>45175369 #>>45188766 #
1. imiric ◴[] No.45188766[source]
Thanks for the OpenBSD guide.

Do you know whether 10Gb NICs are supported in OpenBSD, and can the link be fully saturated?

I'd be interested in building a DIY router on OpenBSD, but I need support for 10Gb SFP+, with an upgrade path beyond that.

replies(1): >>45191642 #
2. thisislife2 ◴[] No.45191642[source]
Yes. Support is there for some 10Gb Intel devices ( https://man.openbsd.org/ix.4 ) and Broadcom devices ( https://man.openbsd.org/bnxt.4 ) including SFP+.
replies(1): >>45195750 #
3. imiric ◴[] No.45195750[source]
Great, thanks!