←back to thread

61 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
jameslk ◴[] No.45186475[source]
> But the bigger problem for housing affordability, he adds, is that "we just haven't built enough [homes] to keep up with the population growth and household formation."

The circular incentive here is left unsaid. If a house is an investment, you and every other homeowner has an incentive to keep supply low and demand high. This ultimately drives votes, lobbying, and policies that prevent houses being built. Otherwise you end up with falling rents and stagnating property prices, like in Austin.

https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/cooling-rent-growth-d...

replies(10): >>45186616 #>>45186658 #>>45187041 #>>45187106 #>>45187123 #>>45187152 #>>45187185 #>>45187391 #>>45187714 #>>45189968 #
1. like_any_other ◴[] No.45187714[source]
That's why the "Century Initiative", lobbying to increase Canada's population to 100 million by 2100, is funded by real-estate investors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century_Initiative#Connections...