←back to thread

1369 points universesquid | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
joaomoreno ◴[] No.45170585[source]
From sindresorhus:

You can run the following to check if you have the malware in your dependency tree:

`rg -u --max-columns=80 _0x112fa8`

Requires ripgrep:

`brew install rg`

https://github.com/chalk/chalk/issues/656#issuecomment-32668...

replies(8): >>45171142 #>>45171275 #>>45171304 #>>45171841 #>>45172110 #>>45172189 #>>45174730 #>>45175821 #
yifanl ◴[] No.45172189[source]
Asking people to run random install scripts just feels very out of place given the context.
replies(2): >>45172767 #>>45174960 #
hunter2_ ◴[] No.45172767[source]
I would agree if this were one of those `curl | sh` scenarios, but don't we consider things like `brew` to be sufficiently low-risk, akin to `apt`, `dnf`, and the like?
replies(3): >>45172964 #>>45174003 #>>45174196 #
dmitrygr ◴[] No.45174003[source]
> don't we consider things like `brew` to be sufficiently low-risk,

Like ... npm?

replies(2): >>45174514 #>>45175021 #
fn-mote ◴[] No.45175021[source]
Nah…

Everybody knows npm is a gaping security issue waiting to happen. Repeatedly.

It’s convenient, so it’s popular.

Many people also don’t vendor their own dependencies, which would slow down the spread at the price of not being instantly up to date.

replies(3): >>45175798 #>>45177580 #>>45186549 #
1. johnisgood ◴[] No.45186549{3}[source]
Convenient, as in the barrier to entry is way too low. I am pretty much against it.