←back to thread

271 points pykello | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.684s | source
Show context
CursedSilicon ◴[] No.45172165[source]
I'm a staunch defender of OpenWRT. Having used just about every "router distro" folks care to name (remember SmoothWall?) for the last 20~ years, OpenWRT is built like a tank and just keeps trundling along

I hope their experiments with the "OpenWRT One" keep going. I'd love to see OpenWRT take a (deserved) bite out of the "SMB firewall vendors" like Netgate or OPNsense. Or just undercutting Wi-Fi vendors like Ubiquiti who base their work on OpenWRT anyway

Something I'm excited to try myself in future is running "OpenWISP" [1] to manage a small fleet (three) OpenWRT devices in parallel for a deployment in a shared workshop. This seems to also be something that OpenWRT could be better at integrating, but it's nice to see "a vendor" tackling it

[1] https://openwisp.org/

replies(13): >>45172279 #>>45172309 #>>45172531 #>>45172754 #>>45172784 #>>45173737 #>>45174002 #>>45174350 #>>45175850 #>>45175928 #>>45176717 #>>45177390 #>>45177963 #
1. brirec ◴[] No.45177390[source]
> vendors like Ubiquiti who base their work on OpenWRT anyway

I thought Ubiquity’s firmwares were all based on Debian. Is this no longer the case?

replies(1): >>45177729 #
2. bigstrat2003 ◴[] No.45177729[source]
I don't know about newer devices, but the older ones (the Edge* devices) had software based on Vyatta. Not sure if that was in turn based on Debian, though.
replies(1): >>45178056 #
3. gonzopancho ◴[] No.45178056[source]
the routers were based on the Vyatta stack.

The WiFi APs were not