←back to thread

271 points pykello | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
CursedSilicon ◴[] No.45172165[source]
I'm a staunch defender of OpenWRT. Having used just about every "router distro" folks care to name (remember SmoothWall?) for the last 20~ years, OpenWRT is built like a tank and just keeps trundling along

I hope their experiments with the "OpenWRT One" keep going. I'd love to see OpenWRT take a (deserved) bite out of the "SMB firewall vendors" like Netgate or OPNsense. Or just undercutting Wi-Fi vendors like Ubiquiti who base their work on OpenWRT anyway

Something I'm excited to try myself in future is running "OpenWISP" [1] to manage a small fleet (three) OpenWRT devices in parallel for a deployment in a shared workshop. This seems to also be something that OpenWRT could be better at integrating, but it's nice to see "a vendor" tackling it

[1] https://openwisp.org/

replies(13): >>45172279 #>>45172309 #>>45172531 #>>45172754 #>>45172784 #>>45173737 #>>45174002 #>>45174350 #>>45175850 #>>45175928 #>>45176717 #>>45177390 #>>45177963 #
pseudosavant ◴[] No.45172784[source]
Ease of managing multiple OpenWRT devices is still its weakest link. OpenWRT is device centric, but I don't want to managed devices, I want to manage a network.

Modern mesh WiFi systems I've seen do that so well. I know in theory that I could create a VLAN + SSID on my OpenWRT router and APs just for iot devices to only access the internet. But setting that up on a TP-Link mesh was a couple of taps in their app. Doing it on my OpenWRT devices would be quite a bit more hassle.

replies(3): >>45174341 #>>45175142 #>>45190404 #
1. ◴[] No.45175142[source]