←back to thread

A critique of package managers

(www.gingerbill.org)
109 points gingerBill | 1 comments | 08 Sep 25 12:18 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
smw ◴[08 Sep 25 13:16 UTC] No.45167873[source]▶
"When using Go for example, you don’t need any third-party libraries to make a web server, Go has it all there and you are done."

Fine, now what if you need to connect to a database, or parse a PDF, or talk to a grpc backend. What a hilariously short-sighted example.

To me, this whole article just screams inexperience.

replies(5): >>45167966 #>>45167975 #>>45168076 #>>45168151 #>>45174508 #
kunley ◴[08 Sep 25 13:24 UTC] No.45167966[source]▶
Inexperience of an author who develops quite successful programming language for like 10 years? Quite a bold statement.

Actually his perspective is quite reasonable. Go is in the other part of the spectrum than languages encouraging "left-pad"-type of libraries, and this is a good thing.

replies(3): >>45168001 #>>45168357 #>>45180682 #
tialaramex ◴[08 Sep 25 13:59 UTC] No.45168357[source]▶
Is it "quite successful"? How would I distinguish such a "quite successful" language from say Hare or V or are these all "successful" in your mind?
replies(3): >>45169557 #>>45169989 #>>45174635 #
1. dismalaf ◴[08 Sep 25 22:05 UTC] No.45174635[source]▶
There's commercial software produced in Odin that has made money. Not sure the same can be said of Hare or V.