←back to thread

271 points pykello | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mifydev ◴[] No.45171662[source]
OpenWRT is such a good os for a router - simple but configurable UI, works reliably, I wish router companies would just ship it by default
replies(2): >>45171681 #>>45190471 #
mifydev ◴[] No.45171681[source]
But then you get annoying firmware providers like Broadcom who refuse to write OSS drivers for linux and a lot of work is being spent on the reverse engineering
replies(5): >>45171723 #>>45172019 #>>45172203 #>>45172879 #>>45175435 #
pbasista ◴[] No.45172019[source]
Ok, but this should not be a major limiting factor.

From my experience, there is sufficient amount of routers based on well-supported chips which work okay with OpenWRT.

When I consider to buy a new router, I go to the OpenWRT device support page, filter for features I would like to get and choose one of the supported routers listed there.

replies(1): >>45172057 #
fiddlerwoaroof ◴[] No.45172057[source]
I gave up on openwrt when I realized that a lot of the recent WiFi standards seem to be badly supported. I think 802.11ac was significantly faster with vendor firmware than openwrt, for example.
replies(2): >>45174547 #>>45185613 #
1. rubatuga ◴[] No.45174547[source]
160mhz ax 6ghz working here with a mediatek chipset