←back to thread

A critique of package managers

(www.gingerbill.org)
109 points gingerBill | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
smw ◴[] No.45167873[source]
"When using Go for example, you don’t need any third-party libraries to make a web server, Go has it all there and you are done."

Fine, now what if you need to connect to a database, or parse a PDF, or talk to a grpc backend. What a hilariously short-sighted example.

To me, this whole article just screams inexperience.

replies(5): >>45167966 #>>45167975 #>>45168076 #>>45168151 #>>45174508 #
kunley ◴[] No.45167966[source]
Inexperience of an author who develops quite successful programming language for like 10 years? Quite a bold statement.

Actually his perspective is quite reasonable. Go is in the other part of the spectrum than languages encouraging "left-pad"-type of libraries, and this is a good thing.

replies(3): >>45168001 #>>45168357 #>>45180682 #
Ygg2 ◴[] No.45168001[source]
I've seen plenty of intelligent people acting pretty stupid.

As my psychology professor used to say. "Smart is how efficiently use your intelligence. Or don't."

So someone pretty low IQ can be smart - Forrest Gump. Or someone high IQ can be dumb occasionally - a professor so very attuned to his research topic at expense of everything else.

replies(2): >>45168115 #>>45174294 #
1. gingerBill ◴[] No.45174294[source]
Thank you?