←back to thread

271 points pykello | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.463s | source
Show context
CursedSilicon ◴[] No.45172165[source]
I'm a staunch defender of OpenWRT. Having used just about every "router distro" folks care to name (remember SmoothWall?) for the last 20~ years, OpenWRT is built like a tank and just keeps trundling along

I hope their experiments with the "OpenWRT One" keep going. I'd love to see OpenWRT take a (deserved) bite out of the "SMB firewall vendors" like Netgate or OPNsense. Or just undercutting Wi-Fi vendors like Ubiquiti who base their work on OpenWRT anyway

Something I'm excited to try myself in future is running "OpenWISP" [1] to manage a small fleet (three) OpenWRT devices in parallel for a deployment in a shared workshop. This seems to also be something that OpenWRT could be better at integrating, but it's nice to see "a vendor" tackling it

[1] https://openwisp.org/

replies(13): >>45172279 #>>45172309 #>>45172531 #>>45172754 #>>45172784 #>>45173737 #>>45174002 #>>45174350 #>>45175850 #>>45175928 #>>45176717 #>>45177390 #>>45177963 #
fidotron ◴[] No.45172754[source]
I definitely believe people underestimate the potential of OpenWRT as an app platform. Before getting sidelined with work I did some proof of concept WebRTC SFU on it https://github.com/atomirex/umbrella which worked surprisingly well.

Was also surprised, then not surprised, to learn it's used as the front end on many of the new generation of 3D printers.

replies(1): >>45173716 #
1. jasonjayr ◴[] No.45173716[source]
I have a bunch of old WD MyBook Live NAS drives (PowerPC CPU) from an older project, and was surprised that OpenWRT was the best way to get a modern linux on them:

https://openwrt.org/toh/western_digital/mybooklive

They're slow, but great for stuff that doesn't need to be fast.