←back to thread

271 points pykello | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CursedSilicon ◴[] No.45172165[source]
I'm a staunch defender of OpenWRT. Having used just about every "router distro" folks care to name (remember SmoothWall?) for the last 20~ years, OpenWRT is built like a tank and just keeps trundling along

I hope their experiments with the "OpenWRT One" keep going. I'd love to see OpenWRT take a (deserved) bite out of the "SMB firewall vendors" like Netgate or OPNsense. Or just undercutting Wi-Fi vendors like Ubiquiti who base their work on OpenWRT anyway

Something I'm excited to try myself in future is running "OpenWISP" [1] to manage a small fleet (three) OpenWRT devices in parallel for a deployment in a shared workshop. This seems to also be something that OpenWRT could be better at integrating, but it's nice to see "a vendor" tackling it

[1] https://openwisp.org/

replies(13): >>45172279 #>>45172309 #>>45172531 #>>45172754 #>>45172784 #>>45173737 #>>45174002 #>>45174350 #>>45175850 #>>45175928 #>>45176717 #>>45177390 #>>45177963 #
foepys ◴[] No.45172309[source]
OpenWISP states in its docs that you should be running at least 20 devices to make it worth it. [1] So it's not supposed to be a easy way to manage a few devices for home users.

> However, OpenWISP may not be the best fit for very small networks (fewer than 20 devices), organizations lacking IT expertise, or enterprises seeking open-source alternatives solely for cost-saving purposes.

1: https://openwisp.org/faq/#suitable

replies(2): >>45172551 #>>45172670 #
1. CursedSilicon ◴[] No.45172551[source]
I saw that. Admittedly I'm only interested in a few of its functions. Namely roaming and guest hotspots

I could wire up all of that manually. But I'm excited for the chance to learn something new