←back to thread

925 points dmitrybrant | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wg0 ◴[] No.45167544[source]
I have used Gemeni and OpenAI models too but at this point - Sonnet is next level undisputed King.

I was able to port a legacy thermal printer user mode driver from legacy convoluted JS to pure modern Typescript in two to three days at the end of which printer did work.

Same caveats apply - I have decent understanding of both languages specifically various legacy JavaScript patterns for modularity to emulate other language features that don't exist in JavaScript such as classes etc.

replies(1): >>45167584 #
piskov ◴[] No.45167584[source]
Check swe-bench results but for C#.

It’s literally pathetic how these things just memorize, not achieve any actual problem-solving

https://arxiv.org/html/2506.12286v3

replies(1): >>45168330 #
antonvs ◴[] No.45168330[source]
You've misunderstood the study that you linked. LLMs certainly memorize, and this can certainly skew benchmarks, but that's not all they do.

Anyone with experience with LLMs will have experienced their actual problem solving ability, which is often impressive.

You'd be better off learning to use them, than speculating without basis about why they won't work.

replies(1): >>45168729 #
piskov ◴[] No.45168729[source]
What exactly did I misunderstand?

Also “learn to use them” feels you’re holding it wrong vibes.

See also

https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/illusion-of-think...

replies(2): >>45168831 #>>45178324 #
1. wg0 ◴[] No.45168831[source]
You did not misunderstand anything. Sure, LLMs have no cognitive abilities. So even with widely used languages, they do hit the wall and need lots of hand holding.