←back to thread

14 Killed in anti-government protests in Nepal

(www.tribuneindia.com)
560 points whatsupdog | 3 comments | 08 Sep 25 11:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.004s | source
Show context
lionturtle ◴[08 Sep 25 11:52 UTC] No.45167176[source]▶
It was absolutely not just social media ban, it was mostly youth protesting against the corrupt government and unfairness, social media ban was one element that was against the freedom of speech, but it was right around the time where everyone was documenting the rich politicians, their business connections and their families that have been living lavishly and just inheriting the election seats from generation to generation and spinning beurocracy to their sides.

I was there a few hours ago. It was a class struggle, but it was bound to be spun up as "kids don't get facebook and throw tantrum".

replies(16): >>45167316 #>>45167350 #>>45167377 #>>45167421 #>>45167463 #>>45167698 #>>45167863 #>>45168071 #>>45168108 #>>45168248 #>>45168256 #>>45168663 #>>45169106 #>>45169494 #>>45170110 #>>45171907 #
factorialboy ◴[08 Sep 25 12:58 UTC] No.45167698[source]▶
Classic color revolution — China and India will be watching intently.
replies(3): >>45167735 #>>45168405 #>>45171058 #
alephnerd ◴[08 Sep 25 13:02 UTC] No.45167735[source]▶
China and India are meddling in this. Nothing in Nepali politics happens without either China or India's hands or implicit blessing. Heck, regional Nepali politicans will literally vie for Nitish Kumar or Lalu Prasad Yadav's (the two perpetual CMs of Bihar) backing.

Even the Armed Forces(pro-India) and the Armed Police Force (pro-China) are at each others throats.

Whenever India feels Nepal is getting too close to China, a crisis happens. When China feels Nepal is getting to close to India, a crisis happens as well.

It's like how Iraqi and Lebanese politics is always meddled in by Saudi and Iran.

Also, the social media ban is extremely damaging.

Most students use Google and YouTube to study, and WhatsApp is heavily used by Nepalis both domestically and abroad (a large portion of Nepalis work abroad in India, the Gulf, Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia, and Japan as migrant workers) so people are cut off from communicating with each other and getting job offers.

replies(4): >>45167866 #>>45168010 #>>45168597 #>>45188235 #
factorialboy ◴[08 Sep 25 13:15 UTC] No.45167866[source]▶
First, Maldives.

Then, Bangladesh,

Now, Nepal.

An unstable Nepal allows the destabilization of two critical states in India.

Regime change in India is the big prize.

--

China and India do meddle.

But a classic color revolution, such as this one, is the signature of you-know-who.

replies(5): >>45167897 #>>45167950 #>>45167977 #>>45168000 #>>45169055 #
1. alephnerd ◴[08 Sep 25 13:18 UTC] No.45167897{3}[source]▶
KP Sharma Oli is pro-China which even Nepali media has pointed out [0]. And his formative years were spent growing up in a village (Garamani) barely 30 km outside Naxalbari during the Naxalbari Uprising, and attended secondary school barely 5 miles (Mechinagar) away from Naxalbari during the uprising.

In Nepali politics, Sher Bahadur Deuba is pro-India and Prachanda is pro-Prachanda (will back India some years, other years will back China).

The whole Indian internet conspiracy of "CIA ki saazish" is ridiculous when the US has barely 20 India scholars at all. There is 0 domain experience in India studies in the US, and that reflects in America's South Asia strategy (there is none).

[0] - https://kathmandupost.com/columns/2025/09/07/oli-s-diplomati...

replies(1): >>45168862 #
2. selimthegrim ◴[08 Sep 25 14:36 UTC] No.45168862[source]▶
Did the departments at Berkeley, Columbia and Chicago just turn over and capsize?
replies(1): >>45169924 #
3. alephnerd ◴[08 Sep 25 16:00 UTC] No.45169924[source]▶
Their scholars primarily specialize in the history of South Asia, not contemporary foreign relations and strategy in South Asia.

IMO, the only American program that has a good program in Contemporary Indian politics and foreign policy is Stanford, as Sumit Ganguly acts as the primary linkage between American and Indian policymakers, and the FSI and Hoover Institution tends to host Indian policymakers and career bureaucrats as affiliates and fellows. For example, during the US-India trade negotiations, the only public visit Nirmala Sitharaman and her staffers had was at the Hoover Institution [0]. Even the USIBC is hosted at Stanford, and that event has a lot of Indian and American dignitaries and policymakers coming.

Other than Christine Fair and a couple Pakistani fellows at HKS, I can't think of a similar domain experts on Pakistan either in the US.

If you want to study contemporary Indian foreign policy outside of India, your only options are NUS, ANU, Stanford, LSE, and maybe Oxford.

It's the same reason why the best China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea scholars tend to be clustered at Harvard and Stanford.

[0] - https://www.hoover.org/events/laying-foundations-developed-i...