←back to thread

560 points whatsupdog | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
beardyw ◴[] No.45167669[source]
> The prime minister said the party is not against social media, “but what cannot be accepted is those doing business in Nepal, making money, and yet not complying with the law”.

I accept that there is corruption and manipulation by the government, but experience tells us also that these companies may be avoiding taxes towards zero.

replies(1): >>45167692 #
alephnerd ◴[] No.45167692[source]
They have all registered with Nepal's revenue office and are paying VAT [0]

The issue is the government in Nepal wants every social media holding company to have a designated person in Nepal who they can directly communicate with for takedowns without going through the traditional process, and if the company does not flllow through, hold that person legally liable.

It's a blatant censorship ploy because protests and dissatisfaction against the KP Sharma Oli, Sher Bahadur Deuba, and Prachanda musical chairs along with various constant corruption scandals are pushing Nepalis to ask for an alternative.

[0] - https://ekantipur.com/business/2025/01/28/en/from-google-met...

replies(3): >>45167734 #>>45167764 #>>45167767 #
1. wtcactus ◴[] No.45167734[source]
So, very similar to what happened with X in Brazil.