←back to thread

129 points xnx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.362s | source
Show context
Workaccount2 ◴[] No.45159284[source]
Google is really shooting themselves in the foot with AI overviews.

It's probably the most popular AI on earth by daily queries, and likewise probably an ~8B level model, it means a whole bunch of people equate Google AI to AI overviews.

replies(6): >>45159506 #>>45159543 #>>45159566 #>>45162173 #>>45163743 #>>45166114 #
danpalmer ◴[] No.45163743[source]
I'm a bit biased, but I find the AI overviews to be basically great. All I want from a search engine is the correct answer, Google's knowledge graph has done that for many queries for a long time, and AI overviews seems like a good next step in that process.

I've not seen many hallucinations, fact checking is fairly straightforward with the onward links, and it's not like I can take any linked content at face value anyway, I'd still want to fact check when it makes sense even if it wasn't AI written.

replies(2): >>45165045 #>>45171502 #
1. squigz ◴[] No.45165045[source]
I constantly get blatant hallucinations. It particularly likes to take feature requests/suggestions and tell me they're presently possible, when they're not. It's long past the point where I just ignore the AI overviews entirely.