That's even before taking on the brutal linux kernel mailing lists for code review explaining what that C code does which could be riddled with bugs that Claude generated.
No thanks and no deal.
Other people commenting about AI hype on the post isn't an indication that the post itself was created to hype AI, or that that the post itself is "bad".
Yes? The person who needs it is using it. Other people who need it (anyone who wants to archive tapes of that kind) now can, too.
> Second, another post on hackernews about how AI helps you code is not AI hype?
Do you think it was written with the intent to specifically hype AI, rather than to report on a passion project?
I suspect HN readers won't see enough value in your baked shit recipe for it to reach the front page - sorry. But bake away!
Yes, you are wrong. And also, if you look around in these HN comments, there's at least one person here who says they have a bunch of these tapes lying around and would love to try the driver themselves. So that's two people!
> Second, any post on hackernews is made to generate hype.
Blanket generalizations like that aren't useful. You don't and can't know any random person's motivation for posting something here.
I don't even really understand why you're commenting. The things you are saying are either just rude or unnecessary. Honestly, if you are that cynical about things posted on this site, why even bother visiting it at all?