←back to thread

115 points cdipaolo | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.541s | source
Show context
linotype[dead post] ◴[] No.45160084[source]
[flagged]
neitherboosh ◴[] No.45160243[source]
Hm, this comment makes me realize that there isn’t really a social consensus on whether or not AI generated content is welcome in these kinds of discussions. On one hand, I’m generally annoyed any time I see unsolicited AI generations because it’s usually garbage and I could have just asked an AI myself. But in this case I probably wasn’t going to and this comment is genuinely insightful…

I guess I would have preferred some kind of qualifier at the beginning saying it’s not written by a human

replies(4): >>45160291 #>>45160322 #>>45160492 #>>45160612 #
jeffbee ◴[] No.45160612[source]
> isn’t really a social consensus

I feel the consensus is clear. Reposting blurbs from robots is anathematic to our discourse.

replies(2): >>45160948 #>>45165642 #
linotype ◴[] No.45160948[source]
Your comment adds way less value than the one I generated, reviewed and posted. I refuse to be bullied by people that are anti-AI.
replies(1): >>45161042 #
1. jeffbee ◴[] No.45161042[source]
Your comment added nothing, because anyone can get ChatGPT to generate that exact comment.
replies(2): >>45161318 #>>45161339 #
2. baggy_trough ◴[] No.45161318[source]
Now we don't have to.
3. linotype ◴[] No.45161339[source]
It was convenience so dozens or hundreds of people didn’t have to. Seriously regret trying to be helpful here.