←back to thread

275 points rntn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dynm ◴[] No.45158964[source]
This article repeats the common mistake of conflating correlations and causality. The main results are (1) that PM2.5 exposure is correlated with dementia in humans, (2) some experimental results with mice. This does not establish causality in humans. The paper is careful to stay juuuust on the right side of the line by carefully using "associated" in the right places. But the press release discards that pretense at rigor and jumps straight to full-on claims of causality in people:

> Long-term exposure accelerates the development of Lewy body dementia and Parkinson’s disease with dementia in people who are predisposed to the conditions.

I think it's entirely possible (perhaps even likely) that this is true. But the paper does not show it.

replies(7): >>45159286 #>>45159316 #>>45160008 #>>45160027 #>>45160407 #>>45161004 #>>45161379 #
Avshalom ◴[] No.45160008[source]
Oh yeah, sure definitely it's just as likely that people predisposed to dementia move to places with high air pollution...
replies(8): >>45160024 #>>45160169 #>>45160435 #>>45160535 #>>45160632 #>>45160873 #>>45160906 #>>45161009 #
1. zosima ◴[] No.45160906[source]
People who are poorer and have worse health are predisposed to live in cheaper dwellings, many of which are closer to roads and thus more noisy and with more air pollution.

People who are poorer and have worse health, also have an increased incidence of dementia, seemingly independently of the number of particles in their dwellings.

replies(1): >>45160981 #
2. Insanity ◴[] No.45160981[source]
I’m not sure this is a completely valid statement. Take Ontario - the most expensive places to live are in Toronto with the most traffic, the cheapest places are more rural without that heavy traffic and thus less pollution.