←back to thread

115 points cdipaolo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
linotype[dead post] ◴[] No.45160084[source]
[flagged]
neitherboosh ◴[] No.45160243[source]
Hm, this comment makes me realize that there isn’t really a social consensus on whether or not AI generated content is welcome in these kinds of discussions. On one hand, I’m generally annoyed any time I see unsolicited AI generations because it’s usually garbage and I could have just asked an AI myself. But in this case I probably wasn’t going to and this comment is genuinely insightful…

I guess I would have preferred some kind of qualifier at the beginning saying it’s not written by a human

replies(4): >>45160291 #>>45160322 #>>45160492 #>>45160612 #
1. umvi ◴[] No.45160322[source]
Yeah kind of like how people put "IANAL but ..." before offering legal advice. Maybe we need a new acronym: "AIG but ..." (AI generated but ...) or maybe "NEWAI but ..." (Non-expert wielding AI but...)