←back to thread

103 points MilnerRoute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
ajross ◴[] No.45158300[source]
Isn't "freed and flown home" the same thing as "deported"? These were routine professionals doing a job they took in good faith under rules and norms that have held for a century or more.
replies(11): >>45158336 #>>45158342 #>>45158358 #>>45158364 #>>45158392 #>>45158408 #>>45158511 #>>45158631 #>>45158787 #>>45158848 #>>45159031 #
gruez ◴[] No.45158358[source]
>Federal and immigration agents arrested 475 people on Thursday — mostly South Korean nationals — while executing a judicial search warrant as part of a criminal investigation into alleged unlawful employment at the facility.

> ...

>South Korea will “push forward measures to review and improve the residency status and visa system for personnel travelling to the United States.”

The implication seems to be that the workers didn't have authorization to work there.

replies(1): >>45158400 #
ajross ◴[] No.45158400[source]
> The implication seems to be that the workers didn't have authorization to work there.

No one ever does, by that standard. In the US, if you're a professional coming in to do some short-term thing, there's no visa process. You just fly in and get the stamp in your passport, which is technically treated as a "waiver of visa". Then you do your job and go home.

Like, have you every flown somewhere to attend a conference and a meeting? Same thing. Where's the "authorization"?

replies(4): >>45158429 #>>45158542 #>>45158575 #>>45158638 #
gruez ◴[] No.45158429[source]
>Like, have you every flown somewhere to attend a conference and a meeting? Same thing. Where's the "authorization"?

Something tells me that working at a factory, even for "training" purposes is very different than attending a conference. Wikipedia confirms this:

>There are restrictions on the type of employment-related activities allowed. Meetings and conferences in relation to the travelers' profession, line of business or employer in their home country are generally acceptable, but most forms of "gainful employment" are not. There are however poorly-classifiable exceptions such as persons performing professional services in the United States for a non-U.S. employer, and persons installing, servicing and repairing commercial or industrial equipment or machinery pursuant to a contract of sale.[26] Performers (such as actors and musicians) who plan on performing live or taping scenes for productions in their country of origin, as well as athletes participating in an athletic event, are likewise not allowed to use the VWP for their respective engagements and are instead required to have an O or P visa prior to arrival. Foreign media representatives and journalists on assignment are required to have a nonimmigrant media (I) visa.[27]

replies(4): >>45158530 #>>45158531 #>>45158608 #>>45158994 #
ghaff ◴[] No.45158608[source]
Even within the US, there's been something of a crackdown on out-of-state work from a tax perspective. Though it has been pretty inconsistent from what I've seen even if companies are starting to use auditors to track via expense reports--though, somewhat weirdly, they don't always follow state laws that are often set up around professional athletes and entertainers. Obviously most people have a right to work out-of-state but they may have to file appropriate tax returns.
replies(1): >>45158730 #
lotsofpulp ◴[] No.45158730[source]
> Obviously most people have a right to work out-of-state but they may have to file appropriate tax returns.

Which US resident would not have the right to work wherever they want in the US?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_under_Unit...

replies(2): >>45158767 #>>45158974 #
1. ghaff ◴[] No.45158767[source]
I don't know. Weasel word :-) I could hypothesize court orders for whatever reason.