←back to thread

103 points MilnerRoute | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.406s | source
Show context
SanjayMehta ◴[] No.45158615[source]
It’s a language issue.

When I first started travelling to the US, I was carefully coached by US HR and Legal to say I was on “business” as in meetings, and not “work.”

I suspect the subtle difference was not understood by the Koreans.

A shoddy way and shortsighted to deal with companies which are investing in your country.

replies(4): >>45158673 #>>45158686 #>>45158749 #>>45158761 #
1. bitcurious ◴[] No.45158673[source]
> I suspect the subtle difference was not understood by the Koreans.

Why would you suspect that a company flying in hundreds of laborers can’t afford a lawyer to give the same guidance your HR company gave? It’s tax evasion and cost cutting.

replies(2): >>45158736 #>>45159687 #
2. SanjayMehta ◴[] No.45158736[source]
Experts setting up machines are not “labour.”
replies(1): >>45159129 #
3. ◴[] No.45159129[source]
4. jacquesm ◴[] No.45159687[source]
When I was much younger I was sent 'onsite' regularly to set up machinery that had been made by the company I worked for. This is still pretty common in anything related to industry because you're just simply not going to be able to train a local to troubleshoot/install a machine that they have no clue about. Some of this stuff takes years to become familiar with.