(www.theguardian.com)

126 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | 07 Sep 25 12:57 UTC | HN request time: 0.199s | source

Show context

Havoc ◴[07 Sep 25 14:23 UTC] No.45158388[source]▶

I'm much more interested in actively filtering it than cutting it. Think yahoo pipes except DIY and more sophisticated. That'll take time to build though.

In the near term I've found that asking an LLM with search/deep research to summarize news helps. Obviously zero shielding from bias, but at least its concise & all in one place

There is also kagi and newsminimalist for out of the box semi-filtered:

https://www.newsminimalist.com/

https://kite.kagi.com/

replies(2): >>45158557 #>>45161638 #

1. 0points ◴[07 Sep 25 14:39 UTC] No.45158557[source]▶

>>45158388 #

I also went the filtering route.

Thanks to atom/rss, it's a evening job at most.

I made a self-censor app that simply scrubs feeds from certain controversial content.

↑

More and more people are tuning the news out: 'Now I don't have that anxiety