←back to thread

230 points mgh2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
xyzelement ◴[] No.45153765[source]
I suspect that in X years we'll learn that sun is not bad for us while the chemicals we apply to our skin are problematic.

What I find personally works is to build up a base tan. I probably did a little sunscreen application back in May but just spend a lot of time outdoors so by the time it got really sunny I had enough tan that I didn't need sunblock to not get burnt.

Even my wife who is very light and "can't tan" - I saw a picture of her when she was a lifeguard in highschool - she's bronze and probably wouldn't need sunblock either.

Obviously people make money when you buy sunscreen so the message that you don't need it doesn't get a lot of amplification.

replies(4): >>45154637 #>>45154913 #>>45156261 #>>45158172 #
seabrookmx ◴[] No.45154913[source]
The message doesn't get a lot of amplification because it's not backed by science. Just because you don't turn red or scab doesn't mean you aren't increasing your risk of skin cancer even with a "base tan."
replies(1): >>45155265 #
xyzelement ◴[] No.45155265[source]
Humana lived without sunblock for millennia, often in sunnier places than you and I.
replies(1): >>45156151 #
wao0uuno ◴[] No.45156151{3}[source]
And they rarely lived for more than 30 years.
replies(2): >>45156883 #>>45158184 #
1. skeeter2020 ◴[] No.45158184{4}[source]
If this is a honest perspective on sunscreen I can't imagine what they potentially believe about vaccines...