←back to thread

422 points sungam | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.407s | source

Coded using Gemini Pro 2.5 (free version) in about 2-3 hours.

Single file including all html/js/css, Vanilla JS, no backend, scores persisted with localStorage.

Deployed using ubuntu/apache2/python/flask on a £5 Digital Ocean server (but could have been hosted on a static hosting provider as it's just a single page with no backend).

Images / metadata stored in an AWS S3 bucket.

Show context
jjallen ◴[] No.45157933[source]
Very cool. I learned a lot as a non dermatologist but someone with a sister who has had melanoma at a very young age.

I went from 50% to 85% very quickly. And that’s because most of them are skin cancer and that was easy to learn.

So my only advice would be to make closer to 50% actually skin cancer.

Although maybe you want to focus on the bad ones and get people to learn those more.

This was way harder than I thought this detection would be. Makes me want to go to a dermatologist.

replies(5): >>45157987 #>>45161503 #>>45161695 #>>45162309 #>>45165481 #
1. sungam ◴[] No.45157987[source]
Thanks, this is a good point - I think a 50:50 balance of cancer versus harmless lesions would be better and will change this in a future version.

Of course in reality the vast majority of skin lesions and moles are harmless and the challenge is identifying those that are not and I think that even a short period of focused training like this can help the average person to identify a concerning lesion.

replies(1): >>45161953 #
2. wizzwizz4 ◴[] No.45161953[source]
https://xkcd.com/2501/