←back to thread

996

(lucumr.pocoo.org)
1002 points genericlemon24 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.321s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45149578[source]
When founders put 996 in their job descriptions or Tweet about their 996 culture it’s a helpful signal to avoid that company.

The only time I’d actually consider crazy schedules was if I was the founder with a huge equity stake and a once in a lifetime opportunity that would benefit from a short period of 996.

For average employees? Absolutely not. If someone wants extraordinary hours they need to be providing extraordinary compensation. Pay me a couple million per year and I’ll do it for a while (though not appropriate for everyone). Pay me the same as the other job opportunities? Absolutely no way I’m going to 996.

In my experience, the 996 teams aren’t actually cranking out more work. They’re just working odd hours, doing a little work on the weekends to say they worked the weekend, and they spend a lot of time relaxing at the office because they’re always there.

replies(17): >>45149967 #>>45149995 #>>45150219 #>>45150354 #>>45150392 #>>45150411 #>>45150444 #>>45150629 #>>45150782 #>>45150842 #>>45150892 #>>45150984 #>>45151100 #>>45151102 #>>45151288 #>>45155515 #>>45155570 #
robterrell ◴[] No.45149967[source]
If you're smart enough to get hired for one of these roles, and you're willing to work 996, be just a little bit smarter and found your own startup and take all the upside.
replies(5): >>45150413 #>>45150956 #>>45151265 #>>45151559 #>>45152279 #
scubbo ◴[] No.45150413[source]
> and take all the upside

And all of the risk.

Encouraging anyone to start their own company is deeply irresponsible. Most startups fail. If you're needing encouragement to do it - if you're not already fully deluded that you're the special snowflake unique genius who will succeed where all others have failed - you shouldn't be doing it.

replies(5): >>45150437 #>>45150461 #>>45150583 #>>45151093 #>>45152622 #
_0ffh ◴[] No.45151093[source]
That's the fun part: If you find investors, then they're taking the actual risk while you pay yourself a nice salary.
replies(1): >>45154277 #
bigbadfeline ◴[] No.45154277[source]
> If you find investors

It's a big if. Few can get funding especially without connections. In that case, the odds are heavily against you.

I'm not sure what is being argued here - if you have connections, can get the money and the opportunity is clear, go for it. However, you should be clear with the above before you put your assets at risk - a job, property, savings or whatever.

It doesn't make sense to follow hype into adventures with odds of success lower than gambling. That seems obvious, but what do I know.

replies(2): >>45156771 #>>45157459 #
1. qcnguy ◴[] No.45157459[source]
Er, we're posting this on a website run by a VC firm that routinely gives out investments to huge numbers of tiny teams from around the world. Literally anyone can apply. And we're supposedly in an AI bubble caused by investors ploughing hundreds of millions into any company with .ai in the name. It can't be true that getting investment is hard and requires connections.