←back to thread

41 points delichon | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.697s | source
1. 3036e4 ◴[] No.45157239[source]
I want this to be true, but I do not know who this Aaron guy is and I do not have the time or skills to check the sources. Not sure what to do about that. Wait and see if this is something I see bubble up as some kind of accepted thing among scientists involved in those kinds of studies?
replies(1): >>45158021 #
2. senko ◴[] No.45158021[source]
Here's what Perplexity Pro deep research has to say about it (pasting only the conclusion for brevity):

The article's claim that cognitive ability peaks between ages 50-60 contains elements of truth but is misleading in its breadth and certainty. While longitudinal research does show that cognitive decline is less severe and starts later than cross-sectional studies suggested, the evidence does not support a simple peak in the 50-60 range for overall cognitive ability.

Key takeaways:

Crystallized intelligence may continue improving into the 50s and 60s

Different cognitive abilities peak at different ages

Individual variation is enormous

Methodological issues in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies complicate interpretation

The 50-60 "peak" claim oversimplifies a complex, multifaceted process

Rather than a single peak age range, the evidence supports a differentiated model of cognitive aging where various abilities follow distinct trajectories, with substantial individual differences influenced by health, education, lifestyle, and genetic factors.

replies(1): >>45161231 #
3. drewbitt ◴[] No.45161231[source]
Personally I feel like that conclusion is vague and kinda sucks