The Claude Code Framework Wars

Pretty surprised BMAD-method wasn't mentioned.

For my money it's by far the best Claude Code compliment.

Same with taskmaster, also not there.

What is this? Just a system prompt? What makes it so good for you?

https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD

The BMAD system seems similar to the AgentOS mentioned in the post.

This way of context engineering has definitely been the way to go for me, although I’ve just implemented it myself… using Claude to help generate commands and agents and tweaking them to my liking, lately been using json as well as markdown to share context between steps.

It’s basically a set of commands and agents and a way to structure context.

I never found taskmaster that useful, something about how it forced you to work didn’t click with me…

It manifests as a sort of extension for Claude Code.

When I'm in the terminal I can call on Agents who can create standardised documents so there is a memory of the product management side of things that extends beyond the context window of Claude.

It guides you through the specification process so that you have extremely tight tasks for Claude to churn through, with any context, documentation and acceptance criteria.

Perhaps there are others similar, but I have found it completely transformative.

This amuses me to no end: https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/issues/546

An AI tool finding issues in a set of YAML and Markdown files generated by an AI tool, and humans puzzled by all of it.

> We should really have some code reviewer...

Gemini to the rescue!

Yeah that's fair, it doesn't feel great. It does work if you have something very concrete you want to make and know how to do it, so its pretty easy to scope out into some tasks and subtasks, but working on something where you generate it as you go and requires editing tasks its pretty bad.

BMAD is mentioned in the QA part, FWIW.

It is Agile for interactive session with an LLM.