←back to thread

277 points simianwords | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
robotcapital ◴[] No.45154570[source]
It’s interesting that most of the comments here read like projections of folk-psych intuitions. LLMs hallucinate because they “think” wrong, or lack self-awareness, or should just refuse. But none of that reflects how these systems actually work. This is a paper from a team working at the state of the art, trying to explain one of the biggest open challenges in LLMs, and instead of engaging with the mechanisms and evidence, we’re rehashing gut-level takes about what they must be doing. Fascinating.
replies(4): >>45154689 #>>45155695 #>>45155909 #>>45155983 #
1. KajMagnus ◴[] No.45155983[source]
Could one say that humans are trained very differently from AIs?

If we (humans) make confident guesses, but are wrong — then, others will look at us disappointedly, thinking "oh s/he doesn't know what s/he is talking about, I'm going to trust them a bit less hereafter". And we'll tend to feel shame and want to withdraw.

That's a pretty strong punishment, for being confidently wrong? Not that odd, then, that humans say "I'm not sure" more often than AIs?