←back to thread

996

(lucumr.pocoo.org)
1001 points genericlemon24 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.359s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45149578[source]
When founders put 996 in their job descriptions or Tweet about their 996 culture it’s a helpful signal to avoid that company.

The only time I’d actually consider crazy schedules was if I was the founder with a huge equity stake and a once in a lifetime opportunity that would benefit from a short period of 996.

For average employees? Absolutely not. If someone wants extraordinary hours they need to be providing extraordinary compensation. Pay me a couple million per year and I’ll do it for a while (though not appropriate for everyone). Pay me the same as the other job opportunities? Absolutely no way I’m going to 996.

In my experience, the 996 teams aren’t actually cranking out more work. They’re just working odd hours, doing a little work on the weekends to say they worked the weekend, and they spend a lot of time relaxing at the office because they’re always there.

replies(17): >>45149967 #>>45149995 #>>45150219 #>>45150354 #>>45150392 #>>45150411 #>>45150444 #>>45150629 #>>45150782 #>>45150842 #>>45150892 #>>45150984 #>>45151100 #>>45151102 #>>45151288 #>>45155515 #>>45155570 #
robterrell ◴[] No.45149967[source]
If you're smart enough to get hired for one of these roles, and you're willing to work 996, be just a little bit smarter and found your own startup and take all the upside.
replies(5): >>45150413 #>>45150956 #>>45151265 #>>45151559 #>>45152279 #
martin-t ◴[] No.45151559[source]
Or nobody could take the upside.

Imagine if ownership of a company was divided according to the amount and skill level of work.

replies(2): >>45151927 #>>45155557 #
1. godelski ◴[] No.45155557[source]
This sounds nice on paper but difficult to implement. I'd love to hear how you'd go about this. But I'm also pretty confident that if you show me a metric I can show you 10 ways to hack it.