←back to thread

177 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
giggyhack ◴[] No.45152912[source]
I have been following this company and several others (Quaise, Fervo, Sage) in the EGS Space for a little bit now, and I think we are on the cusp of a huge breakthrough in baseload renewable energy. This site in Utah is one of the largest test cases that expands the use of EGS to a much broader area than just a few geothermal hot spots. Prices are dropping dramatically, and these things are moving quickly beyond the R&D phase. There is a world where every major data center across the Western US has its own base load power supply that has essentially no pollution, no footprint, no hazardous waste, and no need for complicated permitting. EGS truly could be a game changer in the world's push to decarbonize. I'm super excited.
replies(4): >>45153074 #>>45153105 #>>45153260 #>>45154235 #
rplnt ◴[] No.45153105[source]
Complicated permitting as compared to what? I would assume it's much more complicated than solar, and less complicated than... is there anything else available at small scale?
replies(3): >>45153128 #>>45153224 #>>45154284 #
loeg ◴[] No.45153224[source]
Nuclear is the comparable power source -- both have high upfront costs, long build times, low operating costs and clean generation. If deep geothermal can come in cheaper than nuclear, there's basically no reason to do nuclear.
replies(1): >>45153256 #
lazide ◴[] No.45153256[source]
Shallower geothermal has a history of causing damaging earthquakes in some geologies.
replies(2): >>45153297 #>>45153367 #
jandrewrogers ◴[] No.45153367[source]
Not really an issue in the US at least. Their primary geothermal basins already have earthquakes far stronger than any that might be triggered by fluid injection. They also have earthquake swarms due to natural circulation of geothermal fluids in some of these areas.

It is mostly an issue in places like Europe that do not have a history of strong earthquakes and therefore lack seismic resistance civil engineering. There are a few places like that in the US (e.g. New England) where a minor M5 earthquake can cause damage but those don't overlap with areas with high geothermal potential.

replies(1): >>45154433 #
loeg ◴[] No.45154433[source]
The deep geothermal people seem to think it can be used ~anywhere, not just traditional geothermal basins.
replies(1): >>45154749 #
1. jandrewrogers ◴[] No.45154749[source]
For sure! I’ve been following this tech for decades. The advantage of high-quality geothermal basins is maximizing the ROI and efficiency of the first installations, which places the product in the best possible light for marketing purposes. It also provides a comparison against more conventional geothermal power generation which is deployed in the same environment.