←back to thread

205 points samspenc | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
bob1029 ◴[] No.45147656[source]
From a purely technical perspective, UE is an absolute monster. It's not even remotely in the same league as Unity, Godot, etc. when it comes to iteration difficulty and tooling.

I struggle with UE over others for any project that doesn't demand an HDRP equivalent and nanometric mesh resolution. Unity isn't exactly a walk in the park either but the iteration speed tends to be much higher if you aren't a AAA wizard with an entire army at your disposal. I've never once had a UE project on my machine that made me feel I was on a happy path.

Godot and Unity are like cheating by comparison. ~Instant play mode and trivial debugging experience makes a huge difference for solo and small teams. Any experienced .NET developer can become productive on a Unity project in <1 day with reasonable mentorship. The best strategy I had for UE was to just use blueprints, but this is really bad at source control and code review time.

replies(9): >>45148077 #>>45148138 #>>45148160 #>>45148564 #>>45149063 #>>45149666 #>>45150591 #>>45151827 #>>45154587 #
1. Melatonic ◴[] No.45154587[source]
Is Cryengine still relevant at all ?

I'm also always surprised we don't see more games on the current gen id software engines

replies(1): >>45156444 #
2. 01HNNWZ0MV43FF ◴[] No.45156444[source]
I never hear about novices using them for free, and just like Photoshop and Python and JavaScript, experts mostly want to use what they learned for free when they were novices