Why not .lan? The key word is official?
Why not .lan? The key word is official?
Thanks, didn't even know it existed.
> I didn't see a specific RFC that reserved .lan
There is no RFC AFAIK, but it has certainly seen some adoption over the past decade. Mikrotik devices use `router.lan` as a default domain name for their routers, for instance. Home labbers on YouTube seem to like to use `.lan`, too.
Would it be fair to think there is a chance `.lan` might get an RFC of its' own given the popularity? Or that's completely irrelevant in case with RFCs? Hard to tell what's the reasoning there - `.home.arpa` seems excessivly long and inconvenient.
Would be a real shame and a bummer if `.lan` ends up becoming public :')
In my interaction with IETF standards they are created / implemented in two ways:
1. They set the forward direction for a new technology before it is wide spread.
2. They wait for a technology to become popular / accepted and start to set standards from that baseline.
Both are reasonable paths of implementation given how the pace of changes in technology.I doubt .lan, .local, .home, etc will either become public or a standard just based on existing devices that default to these domains and documentation or books that might reference them as example domains.