←back to thread

220 points speckx | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
n4bz0r ◴[] No.45144931[source]
> I really should use the official .internal TLD (Top Level Domain) for my homelab network, but I decided against it. This introduces the risk of name resolution problems, should someone offer a public .jhw TLD in future. It’s a risk I am willing to accept in exchange for using a 3 letter TLD at home. Don’t be like me! Use .internal instead. With that out of the way, let’s continue.

Why not .lan? The key word is official?

replies(4): >>45145040 #>>45145079 #>>45146363 #>>45147234 #
ZeroSolstice ◴[] No.45146363[source]
I didn't see a specific RFC that reserved .lan however from the proposed standard RFC 8375 home.arpa is suggested.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8375

replies(1): >>45154281 #
1. n4bz0r ◴[] No.45154281[source]
> home.arpa is suggested

Thanks, didn't even know it existed.

> I didn't see a specific RFC that reserved .lan

There is no RFC AFAIK, but it has certainly seen some adoption over the past decade. Mikrotik devices use `router.lan` as a default domain name for their routers, for instance. Home labbers on YouTube seem to like to use `.lan`, too.

Would it be fair to think there is a chance `.lan` might get an RFC of its' own given the popularity? Or that's completely irrelevant in case with RFCs? Hard to tell what's the reasoning there - `.home.arpa` seems excessivly long and inconvenient.

Would be a real shame and a bummer if `.lan` ends up becoming public :')

replies(1): >>45155080 #
2. ZeroSolstice ◴[] No.45155080[source]
I agree it would be great to get some of the vendor pushed / common domains put into an accepted standard.

In my interaction with IETF standards they are created / implemented in two ways:

  1. They set the forward direction for a new technology before it is wide spread.
  2. They wait for a technology to become popular / accepted and start to set standards from that baseline.
Both are reasonable paths of implementation given how the pace of changes in technology.

I doubt .lan, .local, .home, etc will either become public or a standard just based on existing devices that default to these domains and documentation or books that might reference them as example domains.

replies(1): >>45155839 #
3. aragilar ◴[] No.45155839[source]
.local is defined for mDNS
replies(1): >>45157276 #
4. ZeroSolstice ◴[] No.45157276{3}[source]
Correct, which is why .local wouldn't become a TLD or part of a standard for home network reserved domains.