←back to thread

88 points azhenley | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
maplant ◴[] No.45153371[source]
This isn't specific to racket, any implementation of R6RS scheme should fully support this, although the define-syntax form is slightly different.

I checked this with my R6RS implementation and it works just as you would expect (https://github.com/maplant/scheme-rs)

replies(3): >>45153752 #>>45153767 #>>45154218 #
1. skrishnamurthi ◴[] No.45154218[source]
Wow — scheme-rs is such a neat project! Hadn't heard of it before!
replies(1): >>45154897 #
2. maplant ◴[] No.45154897[source]
Thanks! I haven’t really publicized it, my goal is to get it finished first, but I will be presenting on it at the scheme workshop at ICFP/SPLASH
replies(1): >>45158598 #
3. skrishnamurthi ◴[] No.45158598[source]
Neat! Will see if I can make it (though I'll probably have to be dealing with OOPSLA stuff at the same time )-:).