←back to thread

230 points mgh2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
matsemann ◴[] No.45153154[source]
Lots of sunscreen brands should be avoided as they don't meet the advertised SPF.

Lots of sunscreen brands should also be avoided as they contain allergy inducing-, hormone altering- or environment damaging- ingredients.

Not easy making a good choice.

replies(3): >>45153231 #>>45153390 #>>45156991 #
andrepd ◴[] No.45153231[source]
The regulator should get rid of those + impose fines, not the user. It's unreasonable to hope the consumer deals with this themselves, that's what the regulator is there for.
replies(1): >>45153494 #
cogman10 ◴[] No.45153494[source]
Agreed. The free market solutions to this problem are completely ineffectual. Nobody is paying a 3rd party to test sunscreen and even if they were, the results wouldn't likely be public and/or would be buried under the giant weight of mommy influencer blogs telling you to use apple cider vinegar instead of sunscreen.

The only way to solve the problem of bad actors in a consumer products market is government regulations, testing, and fines/dissolution of the bad actors.

replies(1): >>45153861 #
ekianjo ◴[] No.45153861[source]
Not the only way. There used to be 3rd parties defending consumers by testing products back in the days, and publishing their results, not sure if those still exist today. The problem with mass manufactured products is that you need to keep testing them. Changes in formulation are a thing so you need to continuously sample and test them.

The problem with government being involved is that this opens the door for easy corruption (haven't we seen this before)

replies(3): >>45154017 #>>45154290 #>>45154335 #
1. FridgeSeal ◴[] No.45154017[source]
> There used to be 3rd parties defending consumers by testing products back in the days, and publishing their results, not sure if those still exist today.

CHOICE in Australia does this, and was the group that did the efficacy tests on a bunch of sunscreens sold in Australia where they found that many were massively underperforming.