←back to thread

177 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
giggyhack ◴[] No.45152912[source]
I have been following this company and several others (Quaise, Fervo, Sage) in the EGS Space for a little bit now, and I think we are on the cusp of a huge breakthrough in baseload renewable energy. This site in Utah is one of the largest test cases that expands the use of EGS to a much broader area than just a few geothermal hot spots. Prices are dropping dramatically, and these things are moving quickly beyond the R&D phase. There is a world where every major data center across the Western US has its own base load power supply that has essentially no pollution, no footprint, no hazardous waste, and no need for complicated permitting. EGS truly could be a game changer in the world's push to decarbonize. I'm super excited.
replies(4): >>45153074 #>>45153105 #>>45153260 #>>45154235 #
rplnt ◴[] No.45153105[source]
Complicated permitting as compared to what? I would assume it's much more complicated than solar, and less complicated than... is there anything else available at small scale?
replies(3): >>45153128 #>>45153224 #>>45154284 #
loeg ◴[] No.45153224[source]
Nuclear is the comparable power source -- both have high upfront costs, long build times, low operating costs and clean generation. If deep geothermal can come in cheaper than nuclear, there's basically no reason to do nuclear.
replies(1): >>45153256 #
lazide ◴[] No.45153256[source]
Shallower geothermal has a history of causing damaging earthquakes in some geologies.
replies(2): >>45153297 #>>45153367 #
1. aDyslecticCrow ◴[] No.45153297[source]
Some versions of deep geothermal does also borrow from the fracking industry which has issues with groundwater pollution.