←back to thread

Stop writing CLI validation. Parse it right the first time

(hackers.pub)
203 points dahlia | 2 comments | 06 Sep 25 18:20 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
HL33tibCe7 ◴[06 Sep 25 21:47 UTC] No.45153174[source]▶
Stopped reading after realising this is written by ChatGPT
replies(3): >>45153243 #>>45153278 #>>45154607 #
1. bfung ◴[06 Sep 25 21:56 UTC] No.45153243[source]▶
Looked human-ish to me, what signs did you see?
replies(1): >>45155590 #
2. bobbiechen ◴[07 Sep 25 05:14 UTC] No.45155590[source]▶
I thought the style was like ChatGPT in a "clever, casual, snarky" prompt flavor as well. I see it a lot on LinkedIn especially in sentence structures like these:

"Invalid data? The parser rejects it. Done."

"That validation logic that used to be 30% of my CLI code? Gone."

"Mutually exclusive groups? Sure. Context-dependent options? Why not."

For me this really piled on at the end of the blog post. But maybe it's just personal style too.