←back to thread

277 points simianwords | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
amelius ◴[] No.45149170[source]
They hallucinate because it's an ill-defined problem with two conflicting usecases:

1. If I tell it the first two lines of a story, I want the LLM to complete the story. This requires hallucination, because it has to make up things. The story has to be original.

2. If I ask it a question, I want it to reply with facts. It should not make up stuff.

LMs were originally designed for (1) because researchers thought that (2) was out of reach. But it turned out that, without any fundamental changes, LMs could do a little bit of (2) and since that discovery things have improved but not to the point that hallucination disappeared or was under control.

replies(10): >>45149354 #>>45149390 #>>45149708 #>>45149889 #>>45149897 #>>45152136 #>>45152227 #>>45152405 #>>45152996 #>>45156457 #
johnnyanmac ◴[] No.45152136[source]
>This requires hallucination, because it has to make up things. The story has to be original.

Is it a hallucination if the story is original? There's a difference between "what's the rest of this famous poem?" and "let's just make poetry".

replies(2): >>45152208 #>>45152481 #
1. lucketone ◴[] No.45152481[source]
It is irrelevant for the point being made: LLM does exactly the same thing in both cases - generates statistically plausible text, based on examples it was exposed during training.