←back to thread

989 points acomjean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aeon_ai ◴[] No.45143392[source]
To be very clear on this point - this is not related to model training.

It’s important in the fair use assessment to understand that the training itself is fair use, but the pirating of the books is the issue at hand here, and is what Anthropic “whoopsied” into in acquiring the training data.

Buying used copies of books, scanning them, and training on it is fine.

Rainbows End was prescient in many ways.

replies(36): >>45143460 #>>45143461 #>>45143507 #>>45143513 #>>45143567 #>>45143731 #>>45143840 #>>45143861 #>>45144037 #>>45144244 #>>45144321 #>>45144837 #>>45144843 #>>45144845 #>>45144903 #>>45144951 #>>45145884 #>>45145907 #>>45146038 #>>45146135 #>>45146167 #>>45146218 #>>45146268 #>>45146425 #>>45146773 #>>45146935 #>>45147139 #>>45147257 #>>45147558 #>>45147682 #>>45148227 #>>45150324 #>>45150567 #>>45151562 #>>45151934 #>>45153210 #
rchaud ◴[] No.45144837[source]
> Buying used copies of books, scanning them, and training on it is fine.

But nobody was ever going to that, not when there are billions in VC dollars at stake for whoever moves fastest. Everybody will simply risk the fine, which tends to not be anywhere close to enough to have a deterrent effect in the future.

That is like saying Uber would have not had any problems if they just entered into a licensing contract with taxi medallion holders. It was faster to just put unlicensed taxis on the streets and use investor money to pay fines and lobby for favorable legislation. In the same way, it was faster for Anthropic to load up their models with un-DRM'd PDFs and ePUBs from wherever instead of licensing them publisher by publisher.

replies(15): >>45144965 #>>45145196 #>>45145216 #>>45145270 #>>45145297 #>>45145300 #>>45145388 #>>45146392 #>>45146407 #>>45146846 #>>45147108 #>>45147461 #>>45148242 #>>45152291 #>>45152841 #
jimmaswell ◴[] No.45146407[source]
> It was faster to just put unlicensed taxis on the streets and use investor money to pay fines and lobby for favorable legislation

And thank god they did. There was no perfectly legal channel to fix the taxi cartel. Now you don't even have to use Uber in many of these places because taxis had to compete - they otherwise never would have stopped pulling the "credit card reader is broken" scam, taking long routes on purpose, and started using tech that made them more accountable to these things as well as harder for them to racially profile passengers. (They would infamously pretend not to see you if they didn't want to give you service back when you had to hail them with an IRL gesture instead of an app..)

replies(6): >>45146717 #>>45146790 #>>45147297 #>>45148098 #>>45148754 #>>45150364 #
33MHz-i486 ◴[] No.45146717[source]
i dont know that its such a great thing in the end. Uber/Lyft is 50-100% more expensive now than taxis were before. Theyre entrenched in different ways.
replies(12): >>45146757 #>>45146963 #>>45147458 #>>45147707 #>>45147992 #>>45148735 #>>45150365 #>>45150670 #>>45151435 #>>45151558 #>>45152545 #>>45220919 #
repeekad ◴[] No.45147458[source]
Did you remember to factor in well over 30% inflation in America in the past 5 years plus Uber Lyft initially losing money on rides to capture market share before they eventually had to actually breakeven?
replies(1): >>45147610 #
TeMPOraL ◴[] No.45147610[source]
> plus Uber Lyft initially losing money on rides to capture market share before they eventually had to actually breakeven?

That's typically considered to be somewhere between assholish and straight up illegal in most civilized economies.

replies(1): >>45147666 #
ghiculescu ◴[] No.45147666[source]
What law is it breaking?
replies(2): >>45147794 #>>45151822 #
1. jowea ◴[] No.45151822{3}[source]
I believe the equivalent for international trade is called "dumping" and is somewhat regulated, although that doesn't apply to Uber.