←back to thread

996

(lucumr.pocoo.org)
1002 points genericlemon24 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stavros ◴[] No.45149464[source]
I don't understand this expectation that employees work more, and stigma if you go home on time, yet we don't have a corresponding stigma for when the amount of money that reaches my account is "only" what we agreed my salary would be.
replies(7): >>45149623 #>>45149739 #>>45149867 #>>45150037 #>>45150218 #>>45150849 #>>45159185 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.45149623[source]
Companies that try to demand extreme hours with average pay have very high turnover.

As employees realize they’re getting a bad deal and that they can find a better ratio of pay to hours worked at other companies, they leave.

replies(2): >>45149651 #>>45149676 #
stavros ◴[] No.45149651[source]
Sure, but why does this rhetoric both persist, and only go one way? You never hear anything about an expectation from employers to pay more than what was agreed.

If I'm an employee with miniscule equity, why would I put in any more time and effort than what was agreed?

replies(2): >>45149925 #>>45151645 #
1. 1penny42cents ◴[] No.45151645{3}[source]
People without equity will work harder if they expect it to bring career or compensation growth.

If it’s a great company, people will work extra hours to move ahead, knowing it will pay off in their careers. “Great company” is always relative to the individual and where they are in their careers.

As people mature in their careers, they split off into “people with equity who continue to work hard for it” and “people without equity who have a good work/life balance”.

But as long as there’s the promise of a life-changing development, people will (sometimes rationally) work outside of their agreed hours.