←back to thread

996

(lucumr.pocoo.org)
1001 points genericlemon24 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.434s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.45149578[source]
When founders put 996 in their job descriptions or Tweet about their 996 culture it’s a helpful signal to avoid that company.

The only time I’d actually consider crazy schedules was if I was the founder with a huge equity stake and a once in a lifetime opportunity that would benefit from a short period of 996.

For average employees? Absolutely not. If someone wants extraordinary hours they need to be providing extraordinary compensation. Pay me a couple million per year and I’ll do it for a while (though not appropriate for everyone). Pay me the same as the other job opportunities? Absolutely no way I’m going to 996.

In my experience, the 996 teams aren’t actually cranking out more work. They’re just working odd hours, doing a little work on the weekends to say they worked the weekend, and they spend a lot of time relaxing at the office because they’re always there.

replies(17): >>45149967 #>>45149995 #>>45150219 #>>45150354 #>>45150392 #>>45150411 #>>45150444 #>>45150629 #>>45150782 #>>45150842 #>>45150892 #>>45150984 #>>45151100 #>>45151102 #>>45151288 #>>45155515 #>>45155570 #
1. gedy ◴[] No.45150444[source]
These founders who tout this nonsense are convinced they got to their position by "hustling" (and not their background, privilege, etc) and think motivated employees should do the same (even if it makes no economic sense for them).

Besides, their 996 is the usual nonsense of posting faux thought leader crap on linkedin. Not being shoved Jira tickets and hurry up with it.

replies(1): >>45155582 #
2. blooalien ◴[] No.45155582[source]
> "convinced they got to their position by "hustling" (and not their background, privilege, etc)"

[1] "If you're rich, you're more lucky than smart."

[1]: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/making-sense/analysis-i...