←back to thread

206 points arbayi | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.61s | source
Show context
andrewla ◴[] No.45141730[source]
Is anybody making smart glasses that are just a display? For me, the rest of the feature set verges on being anti-features. I'd much rather a very rudimentary display that my phone or another device could send relatively low bandwidth data to over bluetooth or some other protocol and build from there.

Having a camera or a mic on the glasses themselves seems like something I'd mostly want to avoid for privacy, and having a speaker just seems like gilding the lily when we already have a variety of headphones to choose from.

replies(15): >>45141760 #>>45141898 #>>45142046 #>>45142191 #>>45142200 #>>45142653 #>>45143450 #>>45143712 #>>45143765 #>>45144145 #>>45145287 #>>45146037 #>>45146638 #>>45147276 #>>45147350 #
1. hnlmorg ◴[] No.45147350[source]
Loads. I’ve got a pair of Xreal glasses and use it regularly.
replies(1): >>45148345 #
2. walterbell ◴[] No.45148345[source]
Viture similarly offers wired USB-c displayport, with myopia adjustment up to -5 diopters, and optional magnetic frame for custom prescriptions. They sell refurbs on eBay and have a Linux SDK. It's surprisingly functional as a mirrored monitor, without the additional software or hardware which adds platform-specific features like virtual monitors.
replies(1): >>45149866 #
3. numpad0 ◴[] No.45149866[source]
Those birdbath stereo smartglasses must be coming from some exact same ODM, they're too same.