←back to thread

398 points ChrisArchitect | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.245s | source
Show context
isodev ◴[] No.45141438[source]
Oh nice. I hope other countries follow suit. It’s quite a shame Google didn’t get Chrome divested from them in the US, would’ve been a “nature is healing” moment for the web.
replies(4): >>45141476 #>>45141539 #>>45143526 #>>45145186 #
roscas ◴[] No.45141539[source]
"would’ve been a “nature is healing” moment for the web". I wish this was true.

The healing will be when all ads and marketing will be down to zero. This companies like Facebook and Google make their billions putting on your face what you don't want or need and someone else pays them good money for that.

You may think it's too radical but we must make marketing illegal. Then fix the web.

replies(5): >>45141713 #>>45141830 #>>45141935 #>>45142173 #>>45142276 #
kyrra ◴[] No.45141713[source]
This is a pipe dream. Advertising always has existed and always will. It comes and goes in different forms, but people like selling things they make or services they provide. Without a way of getting those things in front of people, nothing new could come to light.

I agree that some sites make advertisements a massive eyesore, but that's a problem that can be solved in other ways.

replies(6): >>45141862 #>>45142400 #>>45143214 #>>45144863 #>>45144894 #>>45147201 #
1. balamatom ◴[] No.45147201[source]
>Without a way of getting those things in front of people, nothing new could come to light.

If my environment was not inundated with advertisement, I'd only be seeing more things that I'd be willing to pay for, not less.

>I agree that some sites make advertisements a massive eyesore, but that's a problem that can be solved in other ways.

Ads are not simply a way of getting your product in front of people. Ever wonder why ads are the fig leaf for mass surveillance? It's because they constitute some primitive, mild, poorly understood, but completely socially acceptable form of *non-consensual behavior modification*.

That this has been tolerated up to now is a historical contigency. Much like other civilizational essentials like tobacco products and leaded gas, as soon as someone prices in the externalities - whether through regulation or through disruption - the societal attitudes to them will quickly change from "unavoidable" towards "inexcusable".