←back to thread

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner

(signalsandthreads.com)
311 points melodyogonna | 1 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
nromiun ◴[05 Sep 25 12:59 UTC] No.45138008[source]▶
Weird that there has been no significant adoption of Mojo. It has been quite some time since it got released and everyone is still using PyTorch. Maybe the license issue is a much bigger deal than people realize.
replies(10): >>45138022 #>>45138094 #>>45138140 #>>45138494 #>>45138853 #>>45138904 #>>45141581 #>>45141912 #>>45142155 #>>45144921 #
jb1991 ◴[05 Sep 25 13:00 UTC] No.45138022[source]▶
It says at the top:

> write state of the art kernels

Mojo seems to be competing with C++ for writing kernels. PyTorch and Julia are high-level languages where you don't write the kernels.

replies(3): >>45138088 #>>45138136 #>>45138151 #
Alexander-Barth ◴[05 Sep 25 13:06 UTC] No.45138088[source]▶
Actually in julia you can write kernels with a subset of the julia language:

https://cuda.juliagpu.org/stable/tutorials/introduction/#Wri...

With KernelAbstractions.jl you can actually target CUDA and ROCm:

https://juliagpu.github.io/KernelAbstractions.jl/stable/kern...

For python (or rather python-like), there is also triton (and probably others):

https://pytorch.org/blog/triton-kernel-compilation-stages/

replies(1): >>45147144 #
1. davidatbu ◴[06 Sep 25 06:38 UTC] No.45147144[source]▶
Chris's claim (at least with regards to Triton) is that it avails 80% of the performance, and they're aiming for closer to 100%.