←back to thread

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner

(signalsandthreads.com)
311 points melodyogonna | 2 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
whimsicalism ◴[06 Sep 25 04:32 UTC] No.45146639[source]▶
I find the attempt behind Mojo bold, but unfortunately a proprietary language a la matlab is a non-starter for me and I assume many other people.
replies(1): >>45147048 #
1. davidatbu ◴[06 Sep 25 06:18 UTC] No.45147048[source]▶
Fwiw, Chris has detailed in many podcasts that Mojo will definitely be entirely open source in the future, and that the only reason it isn't now is that he learnt from his experience running Swift as an open source project that the open contribution and planning model is a bad fit, and basically counter productive, at this stage of a language's lifetime.

That is why they opted to open source in stages (ie, the stdlib is open source right now, and they expect to open source the compiler soon).

replies(1): >>45147402 #
2. procaryote ◴[06 Sep 25 07:46 UTC] No.45147402[source]▶
That's nice... once it's fully open source and forkable, it might be worth a look